CHIKKASWAMY vs MAHADEV.C.P — 154/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

PCR - PRIVATE COMPLAINT REGISTER

CNR: KAMD410009952026

Filing Number

156/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

154/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALAVALLI

Judge

869-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Malavalli

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIKKASWAMY

    Adv. RAMESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEV.C.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court took cognizance against accused Mahadev C.P. for an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that complainant Chikkaswamy had complied with all statutory requirements: the cheque bounced, a mandatory notice was issued within 30 days, the accused failed to pay within 15 days, and the complaint was filed within the stipulated period. The court registered a criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the accused with copies of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Malavalli

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court took cognizance against accused Mahadev C.P. for an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that complainant Chikkaswamy had complied with all statutory requirements: the cheque bounced, a mandatory notice was issued within 30 days, the accused failed to pay within 15 days, and the complaint was filed within the stipulated period. The court registered a criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the accused with copies of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case