GURUDATH M.K vs RANI.K.S — 151/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,AND,223. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

PCR - PRIVATE COMPLAINT REGISTER

CNR: KAMD410009922026

Filing Number

153/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

151/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALAVALLI

Judge

869-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Malavalli

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,AND,223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURUDATH M.K

    Adv. S.V.SUBRAMANYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANI.K.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court took cognizance of a cheque bouncing complaint filed by GURUDATH M.K against RANI.K.S under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that all procedural requirements were satisfied: the mandatory notice was issued within 30 days of cheque bounce intimation, the accused failed to pay within 15 days of receiving the notice, and the complaint was filed within the stipulated timeframe. The court registered the case as a criminal complaint and issued summons to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Malavalli

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court took cognizance of a cheque bouncing complaint filed by GURUDATH M.K against RANI.K.S under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that all procedural requirements were satisfied: the mandatory notice was issued within 30 days of cheque bounce intimation, the accused failed to pay within 15 days of receiving the notice, and the complaint was filed within the stipulated timeframe. The court registered the case as a criminal complaint and issued summons to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case