Parvathamma vs Ragavendra — 201/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,Rule,1,of,R/W/s,26,of,CPC. Status: Evidence CIVIL. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMD310010342023
Filing Number
199/2023
Filing Date
31-Mar-2023
Registration No
201/2023
Registration Date
01-Apr-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADDUR
Judge
417-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Parvathamma
Adv. A.M.Puttaraju
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ragavendra
-
2.Harsha
-
3.Mallamma
-
4.Mallamma
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 201/2023 (Parvathamma v. Ragavendra and Harsha and Mallamma) In this civil property dispute heard on 16-06-2026, petitioner Parvathamma (represented by respondents' counsel) testified regarding ancestral property rights among eight siblings. The case involves claims to properties allegedly belonging to their grandfather, with Parvathamma, Mallamma, and Putamma surviving; others deceased with heirs as parties. The respondent's counsel challenged the petitioner's testimony, denying various assertions including that Ragavendra and Harsha conduct joint family affairs, and contesting claims about property divisions and sales. The court found no further cross-examination necessary and recorded the petitioner's sworn statement concluding the examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
14-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
12-Sep-2024
For Issues
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
10-Sep-2024
Notice And Objections
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
09-Aug-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
27-Jun-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
07-Oct-2023
Evidence CIVIL
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
30-Aug-2023
Awaiting Services Of Notices/Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
24-Jul-2023
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
08-Jul-2023
Hearing
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
23-Jun-2023
For Section 89 CPC/Counseling
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
22-May-2023
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
05-Apr-2023
Summons
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Maddur
-
01-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 201/2023
Summary of Case 201/2023 (Parvathamma v. Ragavendra and Harsha and Mallamma) In this civil property dispute heard on 16-06-2026, petitioner Parvathamma (represented by respondents' counsel) testified regarding ancestral property rights among eight siblings. The case involves claims to properties allegedly belonging to their grandfather, with Parvathamma, Mallamma, and Putamma surviving; others deceased with heirs as parties. The respondent's counsel challenged the petitioner's testimony, denying various assertions including that Ragavendra and Harsha conduct joint family affairs, and contesting claims about property divisions and sales. The court found no further cross-examination necessary and recorded the petitioner's sworn statement concluding the examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts