K P RAJASHEKARAPPA vs PUTTASWAMY — 28/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,43,RULE,1(r),R/W/S,151. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KAMD300006732025

Filing Number

28/2025

Filing Date

16-Aug-2025

Registration No

28/2025

Registration Date

16-Aug-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADDUR

Judge

1249-Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,43,RULE,1(r),R/W/S,151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K P RAJASHEKARAPPA

    Adv. M.M.PRASHANTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUTTASWAMY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    List of DocumentsView PDF

    The court dismissed the appeal filed by K P Rajashekarappa against Puttaswamy for non-prosecution. The appellant's counsel requested time to file written arguments, but the court rejected this prayer and proceeded to dismiss the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments CIVIL

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments CIVIL

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Arguments CIVIL

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments CIVIL

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Arguments CIVIL

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 25-Oct-2025

    For Filing Written Statement

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    For Filing Written Statement

    Iaddl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 16-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appeal filed by K P Rajashekarappa against Puttaswamy for non-prosecution. The appellant's counsel requested time to file written arguments, but the court rejected this prayer and proceeded to dismiss the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case