SHASHIREKA D N vs GURU L G — 319/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

PCR - PRIVATE COMPLAINT REGISTER

CNR: KAMD210021342025

e-Filing Number

02-12-2025

Filing Number

321/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

319/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJAPETE

Judge

1089-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHASHIREKA D N

    Adv. BOREGOWDA K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURU L G

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court admitted the complaint filed by Shashireka D N against Guru L G under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonor, finding sufficient prima facie evidence. The court ordered case registration, directed issuance of summons to the accused, and set the returnable date as 06.07.2026, treating the complainant's sworn statement as examination-in-chief per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Criminal

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 319/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court admitted the complaint filed by Shashireka D N against Guru L G under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonor, finding sufficient prima facie evidence. The court ordered case registration, directed issuance of summons to the accused, and set the returnable date as 06.07.2026, treating the complainant's sworn statement as examination-in-chief per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case