NANJEGOWDA vs JAVARAMMA — 24/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41RULE1R/W,96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAMD200004442025
e-Filing Number
26-03-2025
Filing Number
24/2025
Filing Date
26-Mar-2025
Registration No
24/2025
Registration Date
02-Apr-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJAPETE
Judge
1067-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANJEGOWDA
Adv. K.N.NAGARAJU
-
2.GEETHA
Adv. K.N.NAGARAJU
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAVARAMMA
-
2.REETHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary: RA 24/2025 (Nanjegowda & Geetha v. Javaramma & Reetha) The appellate court dismissed the appeal challenging the trial court's partition decree. The court held that the suit schedule properties were ancestral joint family properties of the propositus Bettegowda, and rejected defendants' arguments that properties inherited by defendant's mother (Kempamma) had blended with the joint family, finding that a Hindu female's separate property cannot blend with joint family property under Hindu law. The court confirmed that plaintiffs, as wife and daughter of deceased Rajegowda, were entitled to their rightful share through partition and separate possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Apr-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Feb-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Feb-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
For Judgment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Dec-2025
Notice And Objections
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Nov-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Nov-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Oct-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Oct-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Oct-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Sep-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Sep-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Aug-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jun-2025
Arguments CIVIL
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2025
Awaiting Records
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jun-2025
Awaiting Records
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-May-2025
Notice And Objections
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Apr-2025
Notice And Objections
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2025
Notice And Objections
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2025
Summary: RA 24/2025 (Nanjegowda & Geetha v. Javaramma & Reetha) The appellate court dismissed the appeal challenging the trial court's partition decree. The court held that the suit schedule properties were ancestral joint family properties of the propositus Bettegowda, and rejected defendants' arguments that properties inherited by defendant's mother (Kempamma) had blended with the joint family, finding that a Hindu female's separate property cannot blend with joint family property under Hindu law. The court confirmed that plaintiffs, as wife and daughter of deceased Rajegowda, were entitled to their rightful share through partition and separate possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts