R SWAMY vs TAHASILDAR — 19/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KAMD200000852026

e-Filing Number

17-01-2026

Filing Number

19/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJAPETE

Judge

803-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R SWAMY

    Adv. RANI RANI

  2. 2.CHALUVAIAH

  3. 3.RAJAIAH

  4. 4.SHIVANNA

  5. 5.REVANNA

  6. 6.KUMARA A.J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 19/2026 Summary The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Late Singaiah S/o Late Bettaiah, who died on 12-04-1982 at Alambadikavalu village, Mandya District. The court found the petitioners' unchallenged testimony credible, noting the respondent issued a non-availability certificate and failed to appear despite notice, and ordered registration subject to payment of late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 19/2026 Summary The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Late Singaiah S/o Late Bettaiah, who died on 12-04-1982 at Alambadikavalu village, Mandya District. The court found the petitioners' unchallenged testimony credible, noting the respondent issued a non-availability certificate and failed to appear despite notice, and ordered registration subject to payment of late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case