SRI.MANJUNATHA ENTERPRISES, CHINYA CIRCLE vs INDUS 555-D TMT STEEL COMPANY,BANGALORE — 62/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section -U/o.7 rule1 of C.P.C-1908. Status: Evidence CIVIL. Next hearing: 01st September 2026.

Evidence CIVIL Next hearing 01-Sep-2026

Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAMD010027392024

Filing Number

62/2024

Filing Date

12-Aug-2024

Registration No

62/2024

Registration Date

13-Aug-2024

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA

Judge

407-Prl District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section -U/o.7 rule1 of C.P.C-1908

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI.MANJUNATHA ENTERPRISES, CHINYA CIRCLE

    Adv. HARIPRASAD.M.B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDUS 555-D TMT STEEL COMPANY,BANGALORE

Case History

  1. 01-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    IssueView PDF

    Case Summary: Com O.S 62/2024 Sri Manjunatha Enterprises v. Indus 555-D TMT Steel Company The Commercial Court in Mandya framed eight issues for trial concerning a commercial dispute. Sri Manjunatha Enterprises claims it paid Rs. 7,25,000 to Indus 555-D TMT Steel Company between July-August 2023 for TMT steel supply, which was allegedly not delivered, causing business losses. The defendant contends the payment was a partial repayment of old dues owed by the original proprietor, not advance for new goods. The case was framed for determination of liability, breach of contract, damages (including business loss and reputation), interest at 14% p.a., and recovery of Rs. 7,50,000 with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    For Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    For Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    For Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    For Steps

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    For Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  11. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  14. 11-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    For Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  16. 29-Mar-2025

    For Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    For Issues

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  18. 14-Feb-2025

    For Filing Written Statement

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  19. 18-Jan-2025

    For Filing Written Statement

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  20. 06-Jan-2025

    For Filing Written Statement

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  21. 07-Dec-2024

    For Apperance Of Parties/Advocates

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  22. 05-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  23. 16-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  24. 30-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Prl District And Sessions Judge

  26. 17-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 12-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Com O.S 62/2024 Sri Manjunatha Enterprises v. Indus 555-D TMT Steel Company The Commercial Court in Mandya framed eight issues for trial concerning a commercial dispute. Sri Manjunatha Enterprises claims it paid Rs. 7,25,000 to Indus 555-D TMT Steel Company between July-August 2023 for TMT steel supply, which was allegedly not delivered, causing business losses. The defendant contends the payment was a partial repayment of old dues owed by the original proprietor, not advance for new goods. The case was framed for determination of liability, breach of contract, damages (including business loss and reputation), interest at 14% p.a., and recovery of Rs. 7,50,000 with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case