MAHESH, GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, MANDYA vs MAHADEVAIAH — 71/2026
Case under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act Section U/Sec.4(1A),21,22. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 20th May 2026.
Spl.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAMD010012862026
Filing Number
71/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
71/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA
Judge
407-Prl District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
MINES AND GEOLOGY,MANDYA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH, GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, MANDYA
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHADEVAIAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Spl.C 71/2026 The Principal District Judge of Mandya acquitted Mahadevaiah of charges under the Karnataka Mines and Minerals (Conservation and Development) Rules (KMMCR) and the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act for illegally transporting 142.24 metric tons of Alankarika stone blocks worth Rs.56,896 in royalty. The court accepted a settlement offer, imposing a penalty of Rs.5,000, which the accused paid, leading to acquittal and cancellation of bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Summons
Prl District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2026
Case Summary: Spl.C 71/2026 The Principal District Judge of Mandya acquitted Mahadevaiah of charges under the Karnataka Mines and Minerals (Conservation and Development) Rules (KMMCR) and the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act for illegally transporting 142.24 metric tons of Alankarika stone blocks worth Rs.56,896 in royalty. The court accepted a settlement offer, imposing a penalty of Rs.5,000, which the accused paid, leading to acquittal and cancellation of bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts