Shivakka W/o Basappa Junjanavar Age.60Yrs Occ.Agril R/o Kittur, Tq and Dt.Dharawad vs Ningappa S/o Laxamappa Karigar Age.52Yrs Occ.Agril R/o Talakala Tq.Kukanoor Dt.Koppal — 340/2021

Case under 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 62. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKP310014622021

Filing Number

346/2021

Filing Date

26-Oct-2021

Registration No

340/2021

Registration Date

26-Oct-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, YELBARGA

Judge

406-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 62

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivakka W/o Basappa Junjanavar Age.60Yrs Occ.Agril R/o Kittur, Tq and Dt.Dharawad

    Adv. B.D.Appoji

  2. 2.Udachamma W/o Devappa Tanakanakal Age.50Yrs Occ.Agril R/o Yettinhatti Tq and Dt.Koppal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ningappa S/o Laxamappa Karigar Age.52Yrs Occ.Agril R/o Talakala Tq.Kukanoor Dt.Koppal

  2. 2.Muttappa S/o Ningappa Bikanahalli Age.35Yrs Occ.Agril R/o Talakala Tq.Kukanoor Dt.Koppal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 340/2021 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit for partition and awarded each party (plaintiffs and defendants) an equal 1/4th share in the ancestral joint family properties. The court rejected the defendants' claim that one property was self-acquired, finding insufficient evidence of independent income to support this assertion. Key Reasoning: The court determined that all suit properties were ancestral and joint family assets inherited by the four children of the deceased propositus Sri.Lakshmappa under Hindu succession law. Despite the defendant's registered sale deed for one property in 2004, the absence of documentary proof of independent income, combined with the fact that the property was purchased during the father's lifetime with no formal family partition occurring, established that it remained joint family property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  10. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  13. 10-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  15. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  16. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  17. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  18. 05-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  19. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  20. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  21. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  22. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  23. 06-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  24. 21-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  25. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  26. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  27. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  28. 07-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  29. 04-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  30. 25-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  31. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  32. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  33. 07-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  34. 07-Jul-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 07-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  36. 29-May-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  37. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  38. 22-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  39. 06-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  40. 02-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  41. 05-Dec-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  42. 05-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  43. 14-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  44. 01-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  45. 30-Sep-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  46. 06-Sep-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  47. 13-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  48. 18-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  49. 13-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  50. 23-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  51. 22-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  52. 31-Jan-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  53. 13-Dec-2021

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  54. 15-Nov-2021

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  55. 26-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 26-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 340/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 340/2021 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit for partition and awarded each party (plaintiffs and defendants) an equal 1/4th share in the ancestral joint family properties. The court rejected the defendants' claim that one property was self-acquired, finding insufficient evidence of independent income to support this assertion. Key Reasoning: The court determined that all suit properties were ancestral and joint family assets inherited by the four children of the deceased propositus Sri.Lakshmappa under Hindu succession law. Despite the defendant's registered sale deed for one property in 2004, the absence of documentary proof of independent income, combined with the fact that the property was purchased during the father's lifetime with no formal family partition occurring, established that it remained joint family property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case