Sangappa So Sharanappa Bingi Urf Shakhapura Age-50Yrs R/o Basapur Pete, Mudhol Tq-Yelburga vs Parasappa So Basappa Devakki Age-61Yrs, R/o Basapur Peti Mudhol Tq-Yelburga — 84/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1ofcpc,Oder39rule1and2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKP300001842024

e-Filing Number

03-04-2024

Filing Number

90/2024

Filing Date

08-Apr-2024

Registration No

84/2024

Registration Date

08-Apr-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, YELBARGA

Judge

923-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1ofcpc,Oder39rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sangappa So Sharanappa Bingi Urf Shakhapura Age-50Yrs R/o Basapur Pete, Mudhol Tq-Yelburga

    Adv. Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parasappa So Basappa Devakki Age-61Yrs, R/o Basapur Peti Mudhol Tq-Yelburga

  2. 2.Manjunath So Mallappa Devakki Age-35Yrs R/o Basapur Peti Mudhol, Tq-Yelburga Dist-Koppal

  3. 3.Basappa So Basappa Bingi Age-35Yrs, R/o Basapur Peti Mudhol Tq-Yelburga Dist-Koppal

  4. 4.Yallamma Wo Kanakappa Bingi Age- 60Ys, R/o Basapur Peti Mudhol Tq-Yelburga Dist-Koppal

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Clarification

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Clarification

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Judgments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 84/2024 Summary On 12-12-2025, the court held the main hearing with the petitioner's counsel present. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted as evidence, with the petitioner confirming the facts stated therein were true. The respondents appeared unopposed, offering no challenge to the petition. The case proceeded for substantive consideration based on the affidavit evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  13. 31-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  16. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  17. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  18. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  19. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  20. 12-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  22. 04-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  24. 26-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  25. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  26. 24-Jul-2024

    Written Statement.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  27. 20-Jun-2024

    Written Statement.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  28. 27-Apr-2024

    Written Statement.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Yelburga

  29. 08-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 08-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 84/2024 Summary On 12-12-2025, the court held the main hearing with the petitioner's counsel present. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted as evidence, with the petitioner confirming the facts stated therein were true. The respondents appeared unopposed, offering no challenge to the petition. The case proceeded for substantive consideration based on the affidavit evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case