Laxamamma W/o Hanamappa Mettinal, Age 68 yr vs Mariyappa S/o Kariyappa Mettinal Age 55 yrs — 313/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7rule1and2cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 29th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKP200019972025
e-Filing Number
09-06-2025
Filing Number
303/2025
Filing Date
10-Jun-2025
Registration No
313/2025
Registration Date
20-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHTAGI
Judge
405-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
Decision Date
29-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Laxamamma W/o Hanamappa Mettinal, Age 68 yr
Adv. SHARNAPPA VITHALAPUR
-
2.Dyamanna S/o Hanamappa Mettinal AGe 35 yrs
Adv. SHARNAPPA VITHALAPUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mariyappa S/o Kariyappa Mettinal Age 55 yrs
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
The suit filed by Laxamamma and Dyamanna against Mariyappa was dismissed on 29-06-2026 by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kushtagi. The plaintiff was absent when the case was called, and although counsel requested time, the court found no grounds to grant the adjournment and rejected the prayer, resulting in dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
-
17-Sep-2025
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
-
28-Jul-2025
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi
-
24-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 313/2025
The suit filed by Laxamamma and Dyamanna against Mariyappa was dismissed on 29-06-2026 by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kushtagi. The plaintiff was absent when the case was called, and although counsel requested time, the court found no grounds to grant the adjournment and rejected the prayer, resulting in dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts