Ratnavva W/o Sharanayya Mandalageri vs Eramma W/o Shankrayya Hiremath alias Naduvinamath — 79/2022

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Jul-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKP200006002022

Filing Number

79/2022

Filing Date

10-Mar-2022

Registration No

79/2022

Registration Date

10-Mar-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHTAGI

Judge

405-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ratnavva W/o Sharanayya Mandalageri

    Adv. V.S.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Eramma W/o Shankrayya Hiremath alias Naduvinamath

  2. 2.Maggemma W/o Shankrayya Hiremath

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  7. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  8. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  9. 08-Apr-2025

    Deposition

    Case 79/2022 Summary On 08.04.2025, the court recorded the witness examination statement. The petitioner's counsel submitted the rejoinder arguments and evidence documents to the court, confirming all contents therein are true. The respondent's counsel requested time for their rejoinder arguments, which was granted, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  12. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  13. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  14. 14-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  15. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  16. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  17. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  18. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  19. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  20. 12-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  21. 31-Oct-2023

    Issue

  22. 31-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  23. 25-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  24. 26-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  25. 05-Apr-2023

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  26. 18-Jan-2023

    Compliance

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  27. 17-Dec-2022

    Compliance

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  28. 05-Nov-2022

    Compliance

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  29. 01-Oct-2022

    Objection.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  30. 20-Aug-2022

    Objection.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  31. 22-Jul-2022

    Objection.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  32. 24-Jun-2022

    Objection.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  33. 14-Jun-2022

    Objection.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  34. 13-Apr-2022

    Objection.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  35. 16-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushtagi

  36. 11-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 10-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 79/2022 Summary On 08.04.2025, the court recorded the witness examination statement. The petitioner's counsel submitted the rejoinder arguments and evidence documents to the court, confirming all contents therein are true. The respondent's counsel requested time for their rejoinder arguments, which was granted, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case