SANDEEP JOSHI S/O GOPALACHAR JOSHI, AGE.29YRS OCC.STUDENT R/O WARD NO.21,NEAR TRINITY SCHOOL SIMPI vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX HOSPET ROAD,KOPPAL — 323/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 02nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKP030052412024
e-Filing Number
24-10-2024
Filing Number
328/2024
Filing Date
24-Oct-2024
Registration No
323/2024
Registration Date
25-Oct-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPAL
Judge
401-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDEEP JOSHI S/O GOPALACHAR JOSHI, AGE.29YRS OCC.STUDENT R/O WARD NO.21,NEAR TRINITY SCHOOL SIMPI
Adv. Kirankumar Ningappa Pawar
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX HOSPET ROAD,KOPPAL
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PUBLIC INFORMATION DDPI OFFICE
-
3.THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, BEO OFFICER, NEAR ASHOK CIRCLE
-
4.THE VICE CHANCELLOR, KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY HUBBLI
-
5.THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EXAMINATIONS BANGLORE
-
6.THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PRE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION BANGLORE
-
7.THE SECRETARY, THE KARNATAKA SECONDRY EDUCATION EXAMINATION BOARD BANGLORE
-
8.THE PRINCIPAL, KSS ARTS AND COMMERCE COLLEGE VIDAYNAGAR
-
9.THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KUSHTAGI
-
10.THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT FIRST GRADE COLLEGE,
-
11.THE PRINCIPAL, SRI GAVISIDDESHWAR PRE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
-
12.THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT BOYS PU COLLEGE KOPPAL
-
13.THE PRINCIPAL,MEMBER HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL MHPS KOPPAL
-
14.THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT MODERN HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Judgment
Case Summary: OS 323/2024 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Koppal granted the plaintiff's suit with costs on June 2, 2026. The court declared the plaintiff's correct date of birth as 25.03.1994 (instead of 22.06.1992) and directed all defendants to rectify this in all educational records upon payment of prescribed fees. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's evidence—including an original birth certificate, horoscope, and school certificates—credible and undisputed by defendants. Since correcting the date caused no prejudice to any party and the error resulted from inadvertence, the relief was granted. The court cited Karnataka government circulars confirming civil court jurisdiction for such record rectification cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
29-Apr-2026
Judgments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
22-Apr-2026
Judgments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
07-Apr-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
27-Mar-2025
For Written statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
07-Feb-2025
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
12-Dec-2024
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
11-Dec-2024
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
27-Nov-2024
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
25-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 323/2024
Case Summary: OS 323/2024 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Koppal granted the plaintiff's suit with costs on June 2, 2026. The court declared the plaintiff's correct date of birth as 25.03.1994 (instead of 22.06.1992) and directed all defendants to rectify this in all educational records upon payment of prescribed fees. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's evidence—including an original birth certificate, horoscope, and school certificates—credible and undisputed by defendants. Since correcting the date caused no prejudice to any party and the error resulted from inadvertence, the relief was granted. The court cited Karnataka government circulars confirming civil court jurisdiction for such record rectification cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts