Siddappa So Balappa Kabbinad, Ro-Hirebommanala, Koppal. vs The Tahashildar Office Koppal — 699/2026
Case under Registration Birth and Death Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKP030021622026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
644/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
699/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPAL
Judge
1299-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siddappa So Balappa Kabbinad, Ro-Hirebommanala, Koppal.
Adv. HANUMESH INGLADAL
-
2.Bandavva W/o Siddappa Kabbinad,R/o Hirebommanal,Tq-Dist-Koppal.
Adv. HANUMESH INGLADAL
-
3.Sharanappa S. K.S/o Siddappa Kabbinad,R/o Hirebommanal, Tq-Dist-Koppal.
Adv. HANUMESH INGLADAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahashildar Office Koppal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Orders
The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar Office Koppal to register the death of Basamma W/o Balappa Kabbinada (who died on 03-10-1985) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and unchallenged, as the respondent failed to appear despite notice, and accepted the explanation for the delayed registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Disposed
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
15-May-2026
Orders
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
24-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 699/2026
The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahashildar Office Koppal to register the death of Basamma W/o Balappa Kabbinada (who died on 03-10-1985) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and unchallenged, as the respondent failed to appear despite notice, and accepted the explanation for the delayed registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts