Gattenna S/o Narayanappa Dinni Age 58 Yrs Occ Business R/o Koppal Tq Dist Koppal vs Mohinbee W/o Babusab Dongri Age 62 Yrs R/o Kopaali Street, Koppal Tq Dist Koppal — 99/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1 CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKP030010652023

e-Filing Number

01-03-2023

Filing Number

93/2023

Filing Date

01-Mar-2023

Registration No

99/2023

Registration Date

06-Mar-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPAL

Judge

401-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1 CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gattenna S/o Narayanappa Dinni Age 58 Yrs Occ Business R/o Koppal Tq Dist Koppal

    Adv. Rakesh Raghavendra Panaghanti

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohinbee W/o Babusab Dongri Age 62 Yrs R/o Kopaali Street, Koppal Tq Dist Koppal

  2. 2.Khajabani W/o Sailaansab Dongri Age 58 Yrs R/o Kopaali Street, Koppal Tq Dist Koppal

  3. 3.Bashusab S/o Davalsab Dongri Age 72 Yrs R/o Kapaali Street, Koppal Tq Dist Koppal

  4. 4.MruturjasabS/o Davalsab Dongri Age 68 Yrs R/o Kapaali Street, Koppal Tq Dist Koppal

  5. 5.Rajasab S/o Davalsab Dongri Age 65 Yrs R/o Kapaali Street, Koppal Tq Dist Koppal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 99/2023 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction with costs. Defendants Nos. 2-4 and all persons claiming under them are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property (Plot Sy.No.120, measuring 1,479.25 sq.ft at Bhagyanagar, Koppal). Key Reasoning: The plaintiff established absolute ownership through an original registered sale deed (dated 25.02.2006) and proved defendants' interference by fencing the property boundaries. The defendants failed to file a written statement or cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence, causing their untraversed version to be deemed admitted under the "Doctrine of Non-Traversal," thereby satisfying all conditions for granting permanent injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  4. 02-May-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  6. 25-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  7. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  8. 21-Apr-2026

    For Amendment

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  9. 18-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  12. 16-Mar-2026

    For Amendment

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  14. 13-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  15. 29-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  16. 10-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  18. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  19. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  20. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  21. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  23. 17-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  24. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  25. 25-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  26. 11-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  27. 13-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  28. 18-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  29. 27-Mar-2023

    For Written statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  30. 07-Mar-2023

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Koppal

  31. 06-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 01-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 99/2023 Court Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction with costs. Defendants Nos. 2-4 and all persons claiming under them are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property (Plot Sy.No.120, measuring 1,479.25 sq.ft at Bhagyanagar, Koppal). Key Reasoning: The plaintiff established absolute ownership through an original registered sale deed (dated 25.02.2006) and proved defendants' interference by fencing the property boundaries. The defendants failed to file a written statement or cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence, causing their untraversed version to be deemed admitted under the "Doctrine of Non-Traversal," thereby satisfying all conditions for granting permanent injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case