The State vs Pattada C.Vikram — 336/2023
Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section U/Sec.304(A),337ofIPC. Status: EVIDENCE- Criminal. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD520006942023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
336/2023
Filing Date
05-05-2023
Registration No
336/2023
Registration Date
05-05-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET
Judge
369-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pattada C.Vikram
Hearing History
Judge: 369-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
EVIDENCE- Criminal
EVIDENCE- Criminal
EVIDENCE- Criminal
EVIDENCE- Criminal
EVIDENCE- Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE- Criminal |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE- Criminal |
| 09-10-2025 | EVIDENCE- Criminal |
| 30-07-2025 | EVIDENCE- Criminal |
| 10-06-2025 | EVIDENCE- Criminal |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a court order from the Principal Civil Judge and First-Class Judicial Magistrate at Virasanpete in Case No. 336/2023 (dated 30-07-2025). The court examined two witnesses whose testimonies were marked as hostile witnesses by the prosecution. Both witnesses testified that they had no knowledge of the case details or how the deceased (Anju) died, and denied making statements to police. The court admitted their statements into evidence as exhibits after the prosecution's cross-examination. The accused's counsel declined to conduct cross-examination, and the main hearing concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a court order from the Principal Civil Judge and First-Class Judicial Magistrate at Virasanpete in Case No. 336/2023 (dated 30-07-2025). The court examined two witnesses whose testimonies were marked as hostile witnesses by the prosecution. Both witnesses testified that they had no knowledge of the case details or how the deceased (Anju) died, and denied making statements to police. The court admitted their statements into evidence as exhibits after the prosecution's cross-examination. The accused's counsel declined to conduct cross-examination, and the main hearing concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts