The Branch Manager Shree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co Ltd, Virajpet Branch. Represent by its Presen vs Prashanth M.P. — 45/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section P/U/S138ofNIAct. Status: Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKD520000742024

Filing Number

45/2024

Filing Date

27-Jan-2024

Registration No

45/2024

Registration Date

27-Jan-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET

Judge

369-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section P/U/S138ofNIAct

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Branch Manager Shree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co Ltd, Virajpet Branch. Represent by its Presen

    Adv. Vishwanath K N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashanth M.P.

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence- Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence- Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence- Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Virajpet (Case No. 45/2024) concluded the main hearing on 06-12-2025 after examination of the complainant's witness. The court reviewed the evidence documents (marked as exhibits NP1-7) and directed that appropriate legal action be taken against the accused. The accused and their counsel were absent during proceedings, and no objections were raised by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence- Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  12. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence- Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  13. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence- Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    PleaView PDF

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence- Criminal

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  16. 12-Aug-2025

    issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  17. 09-Jul-2025

    issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  18. 26-Jun-2025

    issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  19. 21-Jun-2025

    issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  20. 04-Jun-2025

    issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  21. 07-Apr-2025

    issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  22. 11-Feb-2025

    issue NBW

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  23. 23-Jan-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  24. 12-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  25. 04-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  26. 11-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  27. 30-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  28. 11-Jun-2024

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  29. 04-May-2024

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Virajpet

  30. 18-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 27-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Civil Judge at Virajpet (Case No. 45/2024) concluded the main hearing on 06-12-2025 after examination of the complainant's witness. The court reviewed the evidence documents (marked as exhibits NP1-7) and directed that appropriate legal action be taken against the accused. The accused and their counsel were absent during proceedings, and no objections were raised by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case