P. B. Cariappa vs Ravi Kumar R — 147/2022

Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section Under,Section,166,of,I,M.V.Act,1989. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKD510004302022

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

147/2022

Filing Date

05-12-2022

Registration No

147/2022

Registration Date

12-12-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET

Judge

368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

Acts & Sections

Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section Under,Section,166,of,I,M.V.Act,1989

Petitioner(s)

P. B. Cariappa

Adv. Annaiah T. M

Respondent(s)

Ravi Kumar R

Zakeer Hussain S.A

The Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,

Hearing History

Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

21-02-2026

SUMMONS

31-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

17-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

19-12-2025

EVIDENCE- Civil

Interim Orders

03-06-2023
Deposition
15-02-2025
Issue
20-06-2025
Deposition
22-11-2025
Deposition
31-01-2026
Deposition

Summary: In MVC 147/2022, the court examined witness testimony regarding discrepancies between an Aadhar card and the chargesheet details of an accused in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness admitted that the accused's details were incorrectly typed in the chargesheet, allegedly to benefit the petitioner with insurance compensation. The court rejected this explanation, finding that submitting a false chargesheet with incorrect details to facilitate insurance claims was improper. The case was adjourned to 31.01.2026 for further witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MVC 147/2022, the court examined witness testimony regarding discrepancies between an Aadhar card and the chargesheet details of an accused in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness admitted that the accused's details were incorrectly typed in the chargesheet, allegedly to benefit the petitioner with insurance compensation. The court rejected this explanation, finding that submitting a false chargesheet with incorrect details to facilitate insurance claims was improper. The case was adjourned to 31.01.2026 for further witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case