Sri Nagaiah H M. vs Sri H M Gopalakrishana — 165/2016

Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section uo7r1,us26CPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKD510003652016

Case disposed

Filing Number

165/2016

Filing Date

28-09-2016

Registration No

165/2016

Registration Date

28-09-2016

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET

Judge

368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section uo7r1,us26CPC

Petitioner(s)

Sri Nagaiah H M.

Adv. Appanna K G

Respondent(s)

Sri H M Gopalakrishana

H M Ashok Kumar

V M Chandrashekar

Hearing History

Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

06-03-2026

Disposed

21-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

24-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-01-2026

ARGUMENTS CIVIL

03-01-2026

ARGUMENTS CIVIL

Interim Orders

22-11-2024
Deposition
19-04-2025
Deposition
02-03-2018
Issue
18-07-2025
Deposition
26-09-2025
Deposition
31-10-2025
Deposition

Summary: In OS 165/2016, the court adjudicated a property dispute concerning Survey No. 7/2 in Virajpete. The court rejected the defendant's claims that the property belonged to the deceased Nagayya's heirs and held that the plaintiff/appellant had no rights over the disputed property. The court upheld the original decree and the appellate order (RA 21/2013), affirming that the property succession and ownership claims were not established in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In OS 165/2016, the court adjudicated a property dispute concerning Survey No. 7/2 in Virajpete. The court rejected the defendant's claims that the property belonged to the deceased Nagayya's heirs and held that the plaintiff/appellant had no rights over the disputed property. The court upheld the original decree and the appellate order (RA 21/2013), affirming that the property succession and ownership claims were not established in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case