Chimmanira Muthanna(Legal Heir) vs Chimmanira S Ponnappa — 19/2018
Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section under,order,20,rules,18,read,with.section,54,of,the,cpc. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAKD510003402018
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Number
19/2018
Filing Date
05-12-2018
Registration No
19/2018
Registration Date
06-12-2018
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET
Judge
368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chimmanira Muthanna(Legal Heir)
Adv. Madappa K M1.
Chimmanira somaiah(Legal Heir)
Chimmanira S. Achappa(Legal Heir) 2.
Chimmanira Mandanna 2.
Chimmanira Kariappa 2.
Chimmanira Suresh
Respondent(s)
Chimmanira S Ponnappa
Chimmanira B.Subbaiah(Legal Heir)
Chimmanira B Machaiah(Legal Heir)
Chimmanira B. Chengappa(Legal Heir)
Chimmanira Aiyanna(Legal Heir)
Chimmanira Poovaiah alias Poovappa
Chimmanira Joyappa
Chimmanira S.Appaiah(Legal Heir)
Chimmanira K. Uthaiah(Legal Heir)
Chimmanira K. Nanjappa(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
ORDERS
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | NOTICE |
| 24-01-2026 | NOTICE |
| 29-11-2025 | NOTICE |
| 15-11-2025 | ORDERS |
| 18-10-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition allowed with conditions. The court held that the 1982 compromise decree in the original partition suit (O.S.34/1978) is not a final decree because it lacks proper boundary descriptions and measurements. Since the present petitioners were not parties to that compromise, they have the right to proceed with their partition petition on merits, provided they first accept the shares previously allotted to all parties in the compromise. If the petitioners fail to accept those shares, the petition will be dismissed for lack of maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition allowed with conditions. The court held that the 1982 compromise decree in the original partition suit (O.S.34/1978) is not a final decree because it lacks proper boundary descriptions and measurements. Since the present petitioners were not parties to that compromise, they have the right to proceed with their partition petition on merits, provided they first accept the shares previously allotted to all parties in the compromise. If the petitioners fail to accept those shares, the petition will be dismissed for lack of maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts