No.238 Ponnampet Town Co.Op.Bank Ltd. Rep. by Manager Sri. T.P Dharmendra vs Nayakara K. Prema — 26/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Section,26,R,W,Order,VII,Rule,1,of,CPC. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
S.C. - Small Cause Suit
CNR: KAKD510003142024
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
25/2024
Filing Date
01-08-2024
Registration No
26/2024
Registration Date
24-08-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET
Judge
368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
No.238 Ponnampet Town Co.Op.Bank Ltd. Rep. by Manager Sri. T.P Dharmendra
Adv. Kalaiah A B
Respondent(s)
Nayakara K. Prema
H.P. Govinda
K. Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS CIVIL
EVIDENCE- Civil
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS CIVIL |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE- Civil |
| 06-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY |
| 24-10-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary On 13.02.2026, the court heard the main trial in a civil case (S.C. 26/224) involving a bank loan dispute. The plaintiff's counsel submitted documentary evidence including the loan application, promissory note, loan agreement, loan sanction terms, guarantee deed, advocate's notice, postal receipts, and bank statements, which were marked as exhibits 1-14. The defendants did not contest the plaintiff's case and did not cross-examine the witness, whose testimony was recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary On 13.02.2026, the court heard the main trial in a civil case (S.C. 26/224) involving a bank loan dispute. The plaintiff's counsel submitted documentary evidence including the loan application, promissory note, loan agreement, loan sanction terms, guarantee deed, advocate's notice, postal receipts, and bank statements, which were marked as exhibits 1-14. The defendants did not contest the plaintiff's case and did not cross-examine the witness, whose testimony was recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts