Mallengada Ponnappa vs Mallengada Vinesh — 5/2018

Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section U,Order,9,Rule,13,CPC. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KAKD510001502018

NOTICE

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

Filing Number

5/2018

Filing Date

28-05-2018

Registration No

5/2018

Registration Date

28-05-2018

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET

Judge

368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

Acts & Sections

Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section U,Order,9,Rule,13,CPC

Petitioner(s)

Mallengada Ponnappa

Adv. Bopanna K P

Respondent(s)

Mallengada Vinesh

Mallengada Latha

Mallengada Kashi

Mallengada Subramani

Mallengada Shanthi

Mallengada Thilaka

Mallengada Ganapathy

Kolathanda Gangamma alias Kamala

Mapangada Poovayya

Mapangada Devayya

Mapangada Sheela

Hearing History

Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

06-03-2026

NOTICE

06-02-2026

NOTICE

12-12-2025

NOTICE

15-11-2025

ARGUMENTS CIVIL

24-10-2025

ARGUMENTS CIVIL

Interim Orders

29-10-2022
Deposition
19-11-2022
Deposition
04-08-2023
Deposition
15-03-2024
Deposition
19-10-2024
Deposition
16-11-2024
Deposition
04-04-2025
Deposition
06-06-2025
Deposition
29-08-2025
Deposition
20-09-2025
Deposition

In CMC case 5/2018, the court heard witness testimony on 20.09.2025 regarding Original Case No. 66/1999. The petitioner's counsel argued that the summons was not properly served and that relevant documents (Exhibits 1-16) were submitted to prove the petitioner's residence in Nittoor village from 1998-2003, predating the original case filing. The court admitted the witness statement into the record and the matter was noted for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In CMC case 5/2018, the court heard witness testimony on 20.09.2025 regarding Original Case No. 66/1999. The petitioner's counsel argued that the summons was not properly served and that relevant documents (Exhibits 1-16) were submitted to prove the petitioner's residence in Nittoor village from 1998-2003, predating the original case filing. The court admitted the witness statement into the record and the matter was noted for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case