Smt Radha V T vs Smt Devakiyane Rani — 35/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UnderorderVIIRule1R/Wsec26oftheCPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKD510001452013

Case disposed

Filing Number

35/2013

Filing Date

22-04-2013

Registration No

35/2013

Registration Date

24-04-2013

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET

Judge

368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section UnderorderVIIRule1R/Wsec26oftheCPC

Petitioner(s)

Smt Radha V T

Adv. C H Srinivas

Respondent(s)

Smt Devakiyane Rani

Smt Kanaka

Sri Poonacha

Smt B M Kamala

Hearing History

Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

06-03-2026

Disposed

06-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

31-01-2026

ARGUMENTS CIVIL

24-01-2026

ORDERS

09-01-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

20-02-2019
Deposition
30-10-2021
Deposition
19-11-2021
Deposition
27-11-2021
Deposition
04-12-2021
Deposition
17-12-2021
Deposition
04-06-2022
Deposition
18-06-2022
Deposition
01-07-2022
Deposition
15-07-2022
Deposition
09-02-2024
Deposition
01-03-2024
Deposition
22-03-2024
Deposition
14-06-2024
Deposition
29-06-2024
Deposition

The text is in Kannada and while readable, it appears to be a witness examination transcript from O.S. 35/2013 dated 29.06.2024. The court examined a witness (DW-3) regarding documents (Exhibits 16, 29, 32, and 33) related to a property transaction involving 5 acres and 74 cents of land. The court found that the witness signed certain documents at the defendant's instruction without fully understanding their contents, and concluded the witness gave false testimony in favor of the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The text is in Kannada and while readable, it appears to be a witness examination transcript from O.S. 35/2013 dated 29.06.2024. The court examined a witness (DW-3) regarding documents (Exhibits 16, 29, 32, and 33) related to a property transaction involving 5 acres and 74 cents of land. The court found that the witness signed certain documents at the defendant's instruction without fully understanding their contents, and concluded the witness gave false testimony in favor of the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case