Sri P P Sathish vs Sri Subhash P P Advocate - Dinesh M K — 15/2019
Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section Under,Order,26,R,W,7,Rules,1,of,CPC. Status: EVIDENCE- Civil. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKD510000872019
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
15/2019
Filing Date
11-03-2019
Registration No
15/2019
Registration Date
11-03-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET
Judge
368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri P P Sathish
Adv. Madappa S A
Respondent(s)
Sri Subhash P P Advocate - Dinesh M K
Sri. Ganesh P.K.
Adv. Dinesh M K
Sri. Dharmaj P.K.
Adv. Dinesh M K
Sri. Subramana P.K.
Adv. Dinesh M K
Sri. Kakera Devaiah
Adv. Dinesh M K
Sri. Ponnappa P.K
Adv. Chinnappa M T
Hearing History
Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET
EVIDENCE- Civil
EVIDENCE- Civil
EVIDENCE- Civil
APPEARANCE OF PARTY
EVIDENCE- Civil
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE- Civil |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE- Civil |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE- Civil |
| 28-11-2025 | APPEARANCE OF PARTY |
| 15-11-2025 | EVIDENCE- Civil |
Interim Orders
This document is a civil suit order from the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Virajpet dated February 7, 2020 (O.S.15/2019). It presents the issues to be decided in a partition case between plaintiff P.P. Sathish and defendants Subhash and others, including questions about whether they constitute a Hindu Undivided Joint Family, whether the scheduled properties are joint family properties, and whether the plaintiff is entitled to partition and separate possession of one acre of land. However, the order only states the issues and does not contain the actual judgment or outcome—page 2 is largely illegible with faded text, preventing determination of whether the petition was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a civil suit order from the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Virajpet dated February 7, 2020 (O.S.15/2019). It presents the issues to be decided in a partition case between plaintiff P.P. Sathish and defendants Subhash and others, including questions about whether they constitute a Hindu Undivided Joint Family, whether the scheduled properties are joint family properties, and whether the plaintiff is entitled to partition and separate possession of one acre of land. However, the order only states the issues and does not contain the actual judgment or outcome—page 2 is largely illegible with faded text, preventing determination of whether the petition was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts