Cheeranda P Pemmaiah vs K T Chandran — 9/2016

Case under Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section U/sec26OrderVIIRule1oftheCPC. Status: EVIDENCE- Civil. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKD510000152016

EVIDENCE- Civil

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

9/2016

Filing Date

07-01-2016

Registration No

9/2016

Registration Date

07-01-2016

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET

Judge

368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

Acts & Sections

Wild Birds and Animals Protection Act Section U/sec26OrderVIIRule1oftheCPC

Petitioner(s)

Cheeranda P Pemmaiah

Adv. Poovanna C K

Respondent(s)

K T Chandran

K T Mohan

Hearing History

Judge: 368-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC VIRAJPET

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE- Civil

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE- Civil

24-01-2026

EVIDENCE- Civil

29-11-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

14-11-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

21-01-2023
Deposition
01-03-2024
Deposition
01-02-2017
Issue
27-09-2025
Deposition
24-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case: O.S. 9/2016 (Original Suit) Outcome: The witness testimony was recorded on 24.01.2026. The court examined witness PW-2 regarding a property dispute involving a sale deed dated 19.03.1994 and claims over agricultural land (davaaswattu). The witness testified about loan transactions, property sales valued at Rs. 35,000, and subsequent installment payments. The case involves disputed ownership and possession of the property, with the witness denying several claims made by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: O.S. 9/2016 (Original Suit) Outcome: The witness testimony was recorded on 24.01.2026. The court examined witness PW-2 regarding a property dispute involving a sale deed dated 19.03.1994 and claims over agricultural land (davaaswattu). The witness testified about loan transactions, property sales valued at Rs. 35,000, and subsequent installment payments. The case involves disputed ownership and possession of the property, with the witness denying several claims made by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, VIRAJPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case