The State by Virajpet Rural PS vs Darshan Thammaiah @ Darshan — 5014/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/Sec.302,506,of,IPC. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAKD500001192024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2024
Filing Number
5014/2024
Filing Date
06-03-2024
Registration No
5014/2024
Registration Date
06-03-2024
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET
Judge
986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State by Virajpet Rural PS (Police Station)
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Darshan Thammaiah @ Darshan
Hearing History
Judge: 986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET
SUMMONS
ORDERS.
HEARING Criminal
FDT-FIXING THE DATE FOR TRIAL
EVIDENCE - Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING Criminal |
| 25-02-2026 | FDT-FIXING THE DATE FOR TRIAL |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. Dr. Ravikumar R testified as a prosecution witness (PW.10) in a criminal case (Cr.No.140/2023) regarding his postmortem examination findings on deceased C.K. Chittiyappa. The doctor concluded that death resulted from shock and hemorrhage due to multiple injuries, and opined that the injuries could have been caused by the two cane sticks examined. The accused's advocate requested time for cross-examination, which was rejected; re-examination was not conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. Dr. Ravikumar R testified as a prosecution witness (PW.10) in a criminal case (Cr.No.140/2023) regarding his postmortem examination findings on deceased C.K. Chittiyappa. The doctor concluded that death resulted from shock and hemorrhage due to multiple injuries, and opined that the injuries could have been caused by the two cane sticks examined. The accused's advocate requested time for cross-examination, which was rejected; re-examination was not conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET All courts →Explore other courts