N. S. Jayaram vs Y. S. Nagamani — 781/2022
Case under 138 of Ni Act. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD400010772022
Filing Number
781/2022
Filing Date
25-08-2022
Registration No
781/2022
Registration Date
25-08-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMVARPET
Judge
367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N. S. Jayaram
Adv. SNH
Respondent(s)
Y. S. Nagamani
Hearing History
Judge: 367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS Criminal
ARGUMENTS Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant failed to prove the cheque was issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt. The judge ruled that without documentary evidence (bank statements/ledger extracts) proving the Rs. 6 lakh loan was given, and given contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding the transaction details, the essential ingredients of Section 138 were not satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the complainant failed to prove the cheque was issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt. The judge ruled that without documentary evidence (bank statements/ledger extracts) proving the Rs. 6 lakh loan was given, and given contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding the transaction details, the essential ingredients of Section 138 were not satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts