Somwarept Excise vs Unnikrishna — 455/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 13(1)(a),13(1)(f),32(1),43 of KE Act. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Summons Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKD400007812025

Filing Number

455/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

455/2025

Registration Date

11-Sep-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMVARPET

Judge

367-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Somvarpet

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 13(1)(a),13(1)(f),32(1),43 of KE Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Somwarept Excise

    Adv. Asst Public Procecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Unnikrishna

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In this excise department case (CC.455/2025), an Excise Inspector's testimony regarding a raid on December 6, 2024, was examined by the defense counsel. The defense challenged the credibility of the investigation, citing procedural irregularities including: lack of proper FIR registration details, absence of independent panchas (witnesses), no video recording of the accused's son, failure to interview purchasers, and alleged creation of false evidence. The court, after hearing arguments from both the prosecution and defense, allowed the defense objections and recorded them in the order, finding significant procedural deficiencies in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Somvarpet

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Somvarpet

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Somvarpet

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Somvarpet

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Somvarpet

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 455/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this excise department case (CC.455/2025), an Excise Inspector's testimony regarding a raid on December 6, 2024, was examined by the defense counsel. The defense challenged the credibility of the investigation, citing procedural irregularities including: lack of proper FIR registration details, absence of independent panchas (witnesses), no video recording of the accused's son, failure to interview purchasers, and alleged creation of false evidence. The court, after hearing arguments from both the prosecution and defense, allowed the defense objections and recorded them in the order, finding significant procedural deficiencies in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case