Somwarpet Excise vs Virupaksha D.K — 387/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 13(1)(a),13(1)(f),32(1),43ofKE act. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKD400006212025

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

387/2025

Filing Date

11-07-2025

Registration No

387/2025

Registration Date

11-07-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMVARPET

Judge

367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section 13(1)(a),13(1)(f),32(1),43ofKE act

Petitioner(s)

Somwarpet Excise

Adv. Vaishali. V.B.

Respondent(s)

Virupaksha D.K

Hearing History

Judge: 367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

20-02-2026

SUMMONS

09-01-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

11-12-2025

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

11-11-2025

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

Interim Orders

11-12-2025
Deposition

Summary In this excise case (C.C. No. 387/2025) from Somarapete Court, Karnataka, an excise inspector documented the seizure of illegal liquor on 16.01.2025. Following a tip-off, officers conducted a search and recovered 5 bottles of illicit liquor (totaling approximately 3.5 liters), 20 liters of raw materials for distillation, and related equipment from the accused's residence. The defense counsel challenged the procedure, alleging lack of proper witnesses and documentation. The court recorded the excise inspector's testimony with detailed evidence documentation, samples sealed for chemical analysis, and photographic records. The case proceeded with evidence marked and forwarded for further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this excise case (C.C. No. 387/2025) from Somarapete Court, Karnataka, an excise inspector documented the seizure of illegal liquor on 16.01.2025. Following a tip-off, officers conducted a search and recovered 5 bottles of illicit liquor (totaling approximately 3.5 liters), 20 liters of raw materials for distillation, and related equipment from the accused's residence. The defense counsel challenged the procedure, alleging lack of proper witnesses and documentation. The court recorded the excise inspector's testimony with detailed evidence documentation, samples sealed for chemical analysis, and photographic records. The case proceeded with evidence marked and forwarded for further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMVARPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case