STATE OF KARNATAKA vs Damodara N.C — 27/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 14,15,32(1),38(a). Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD400000862024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
30-01-2024
Registration No
27/2024
Registration Date
30-01-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMVARPET
Judge
367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Damodara N.C
Hearing History
Judge: 367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
WRITEN STATEMENT
WRITEN STATEMENT
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 23-01-2026 | WRITEN STATEMENT |
| 19-12-2025 | WRITEN STATEMENT |
| 21-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is a Kannada language court order (Criminal Case No. 27/2024) from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court in Somawarapet. The case involves an excise officer (Godwin, age 40) who seized approximately 112 liters of illegal brandy from a residence on 16-08-2023 following a tip-off about unlicensed alcohol sales. Summary: The court recorded the prosecution witness's (excise officer's) examination-in-chief detailing the search operation, seizure of alcohol bottles, and preparation of the mahazar (search report). The defense counsel's cross-examination raised procedural objections regarding missing signatures, lack of case reference numbers in certain documents, and questioned the authenticity of evidence. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted various exhibits into evidence, with no further cross-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Kannada language court order (Criminal Case No. 27/2024) from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court in Somawarapet. The case involves an excise officer (Godwin, age 40) who seized approximately 112 liters of illegal brandy from a residence on 16-08-2023 following a tip-off about unlicensed alcohol sales. Summary: The court recorded the prosecution witness's (excise officer's) examination-in-chief detailing the search operation, seizure of alcohol bottles, and preparation of the mahazar (search report). The defense counsel's cross-examination raised procedural objections regarding missing signatures, lack of case reference numbers in certain documents, and questioned the authenticity of evidence. The court recorded the witness's testimony and admitted various exhibits into evidence, with no further cross-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts