STATE OF KARNATAKA vs Teerthakumar M.K — 9/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 13(1)(a),13(1)(f),14(2),32(1)(i),32(2()e),34,43(1). Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD400000192025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
08-01-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
08-01-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMVARPET
Judge
367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Teerthakumar M.K
Hearing History
Judge: 367-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SOMVARPET
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 09-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 12-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 14-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Criminal Case (CC 9/2025) from the Civil Judge and JOFIC Court in Somarapete, Karnataka, involving a search and seizure operation related to illegal distillery. On 01.08.2024, an Excise officer acting on information seized approximately 45 liters of illicit liquor, distillery equipment, and 180 liters of jaggery extract from the accused's residence in Gonimarur village. The court examined the excise officer's testimony regarding the search procedure, evidence collection, and documentation. The defense challenged procedural irregularities including discrepancies in dates, lack of local witnesses, and missing signatures on exhibits, but these objections were noted for consideration during further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Criminal Case (CC 9/2025) from the Civil Judge and JOFIC Court in Somarapete, Karnataka, involving a search and seizure operation related to illegal distillery. On 01.08.2024, an Excise officer acting on information seized approximately 45 liters of illicit liquor, distillery equipment, and 180 liters of jaggery extract from the accused's residence in Gonimarur village. The court examined the excise officer's testimony regarding the search procedure, evidence collection, and documentation. The defense challenged procedural irregularities including discrepancies in dates, lack of local witnesses, and missing signatures on exhibits, but these objections were noted for consideration during further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts