C.N. Pavithra Kumar vs C.M. Machaiah Advocate - Rakesh M G — 71/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Section,26,Read,With,Order,7,Rule,1,of,C.P.C. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKD300027722025
Filing Number
73/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
71/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET
Judge
1012-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C.N. Pavithra Kumar
Adv. Bopanna K P
Respondent(s)
-
1.C.M. Machaiah Advocate - Rakesh M G
-
2.Smt. Chendira Shanthi
-
3.C.M.Dany
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of exclusive possession over the disputed properties based on alleged family settlements and agreements. The judge concluded that the property documents did not support the plaintiff's claims, as some properties were already registered in defendants' names through gift deeds, and the plaintiff's sister had filed a separate partition suit challenging these same arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
26-Feb-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
24-Feb-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
16-Feb-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
12-Feb-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
07-Feb-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
30-Jan-2026
Objection Civil
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
17-Dec-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ponnampet
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2025
The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of exclusive possession over the disputed properties based on alleged family settlements and agreements. The judge concluded that the property documents did not support the plaintiff's claims, as some properties were already registered in defendants' names through gift deeds, and the plaintiff's sister had filed a separate partition suit challenging these same arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts