Fathima vs Nagesh Advocate - Mohammad Rafik M Navalgund — 1410/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section P/U/Sec,138,of,N.I.Act. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD300020822023
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
1410/2023
Filing Date
16-11-2023
Registration No
1410/2023
Registration Date
16-11-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET
Judge
1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Fathima
Adv. Jancy D. R.
Respondent(s)
Nagesh Advocate - Mohammad Rafik M Navalgund
Hearing History
Judge: 1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
OBJECTION Criminal
ARGUMENTS Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 16-02-2026 | OBJECTION Criminal |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
Interim Orders
This is a civil case (C.C. No. 1410/2023) from Ponnampete Court in Kodagu district involving a cheque bounce dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The plaintiff Fatima lent ₹1,50,000 to the defendant Nagesh, who issued a cheque (No. 806390) that bounced on 10.07.2023 with "insufficient funds" returned by the bank. The case is proceeding on merits as the defendant did not admit liability and sought trial; statements were recorded on 12.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil case (C.C. No. 1410/2023) from Ponnampete Court in Kodagu district involving a cheque bounce dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The plaintiff Fatima lent ₹1,50,000 to the defendant Nagesh, who issued a cheque (No. 806390) that bounced on 10.07.2023 with "insufficient funds" returned by the bank. The case is proceeding on merits as the defendant did not admit liability and sought trial; statements were recorded on 12.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts