Gonikoppal Police Station vs Shivanna alias Shiva Advocate - Iyappa B M — 1007/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKD300020342019

EVIDENCE - Criminal

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

1007/2019

Filing Date

26-11-2019

Registration No

1007/2019

Registration Date

26-11-2019

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET

Judge

1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380

Petitioner(s)

Gonikoppal Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Shivanna alias Shiva Advocate - Iyappa B M

Vinod alias Slaiman

Adv. Iyappa B M

Muthu

Kirana

Adv. Iyappa B M

Hearing History

Judge: 1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

09-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

18-12-2025

EVIDENCE - Criminal

29-11-2025

EVIDENCE - Criminal

Interim Orders

09-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. No. 1007/2019) before the Civil Court at Pennāpet involving the examination of witness Mallesh H.C. on 09.02.2026. The witness testified regarding the seizure of a vehicle carrying livestock (6 goats and 2 kids) on 02.08.2019, during a night patrol. The court found critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of proper mahazar (contemporaneous record), missing FIR details, and inconsistencies in the witness account regarding the accused persons' involvement. The court has dismissed the case, finding insufficient evidence to establish the charges against the accused as the prosecution failed to prove the necessary elements of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. No. 1007/2019) before the Civil Court at Pennāpet involving the examination of witness Mallesh H.C. on 09.02.2026. The witness testified regarding the seizure of a vehicle carrying livestock (6 goats and 2 kids) on 02.08.2019, during a night patrol. The court found critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of proper mahazar (contemporaneous record), missing FIR details, and inconsistencies in the witness account regarding the accused persons' involvement. The court has dismissed the case, finding insufficient evidence to establish the charges against the accused as the prosecution failed to prove the necessary elements of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case