K.M.Sonia Madaiah vs K.M.Leelavathi Advocate - Kaveriappa S D — 157/2018
Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 12. Status: ARGUMENTS Criminal. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKD300013372018
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
157/2018
Filing Date
29-08-2018
Registration No
157/2018
Registration Date
29-08-2018
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET
Judge
1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.M.Sonia Madaiah
Adv. Suresh V.S
Respondent(s)
K.M.Leelavathi Advocate - Kaveriappa S D
Nisheen K.M
Kandera Prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET
ARGUMENTS Criminal
ARGUMENTS Criminal
ARGUMENTS Criminal
ARGUMENTS Criminal
HEARING Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
| 03-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
| 07-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Criminal |
| 02-02-2026 | HEARING Criminal |
Interim Orders
This document is in Kannada and appears to be a detailed property dispute judgment from a criminal miscellaneous case (Crl. Misc. No. 157/2018) dated 17.12.2025. The order discusses property ownership issues, transfers between family members, and various land documents involving multiple survey numbers. The court examined evidence regarding property rights and family disputes over agricultural land ownership. The petition appears to have been dismissed, as the court addressed the merits of the dispute regarding property transfers and found against the petitioner's claims regarding ownership and possession of the disputed properties. The order concludes that no relief could be granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is in Kannada and appears to be a detailed property dispute judgment from a criminal miscellaneous case (Crl. Misc. No. 157/2018) dated 17.12.2025. The order discusses property ownership issues, transfers between family members, and various land documents involving multiple survey numbers. The court examined evidence regarding property rights and family disputes over agricultural land ownership. The petition appears to have been dismissed, as the court addressed the merits of the dispute regarding property transfers and found against the petitioner's claims regarding ownership and possession of the disputed properties. The order concludes that no relief could be granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts