Gonikoppal Police Station vs Shyju K. C. Advocate - Anitha C B — 679/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section p/u/sec,323,324,354(D),509,of,IPC. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKD300011712022

EVIDENCE - Criminal

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

679/2022

Filing Date

26-04-2022

Registration No

679/2022

Registration Date

26-04-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET

Judge

1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section p/u/sec,323,324,354(D),509,of,IPC

Petitioner(s)

Gonikoppal Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Shyju K. C. Advocate - Anitha C B

Hearing History

Judge: 1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

24-12-2025

EVIDENCE - Criminal

22-11-2025

EVIDENCE - Criminal

Interim Orders

17-06-2025
Deposition
25-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

This is a civil court order from Bangalore (C.C. No. 679/2022) dated 06.03.2026 recording witness examination in what appears to be a matrimonial or domestic dispute case. The witness (Shreya, age 26, a businesswoman) testified regarding alleged misconduct by the accused, but her testimony was heavily challenged during cross-examination by the opposing counsel, with multiple assertions rejected as unreliable. The court recorded the witness statement and cross-examination, with no further examination ordered, and the case appears to be in the evidence recording stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil court order from Bangalore (C.C. No. 679/2022) dated 06.03.2026 recording witness examination in what appears to be a matrimonial or domestic dispute case. The witness (Shreya, age 26, a businesswoman) testified regarding alleged misconduct by the accused, but her testimony was heavily challenged during cross-examination by the opposing counsel, with multiple assertions rejected as unreliable. The court recorded the witness statement and cross-examination, with no further examination ordered, and the case appears to be in the evidence recording stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case