The CEO, PACCS, Srimangala Branch vs H.D.Rukmini Advocate - P.K.Ganapathy — 159/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section P/U/Sec,138,of,N.I.Act. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD300004042020
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
159/2020
Filing Date
23-03-2020
Registration No
159/2020
Registration Date
23-03-2020
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, PONNAMPET
Judge
1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The CEO, PACCS, Srimangala Branch
Adv. Jayaram D T
Respondent(s)
H.D.Rukmini Advocate - P.K.Ganapathy
Hearing History
Judge: 1012-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET
EVIDENCE - Criminal
MEDIATION CENTER
MEDIATION CENTER
SETTLEMENT
EVIDENCE - Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 06-03-2026 | MEDIATION CENTER |
| 24-01-2026 | MEDIATION CENTER |
| 22-12-2025 | SETTLEMENT |
| 12-11-2025 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
Interim Orders
This civil case (C.C. No. 159/2020) involves a cheque bounce dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The plaintiff-bank claims the defendant borrowed ₹60,000 on 20.03.2017, which accumulated to ₹88,000 with interest, and issued a cheque (No. 966415) that was dishonored on 27.01.2020 due to insufficient funds despite a legal notice. The case is posted for further proceedings, with the defendant denying the allegations and demanding trial on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This civil case (C.C. No. 159/2020) involves a cheque bounce dispute under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The plaintiff-bank claims the defendant borrowed ₹60,000 on 20.03.2017, which accumulated to ₹88,000 with interest, and issued a cheque (No. 966415) that was dishonored on 27.01.2020 due to insufficient funds despite a legal notice. The case is posted for further proceedings, with the defendant denying the allegations and demanding trial on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts