K N Pavan Kumar vs Kumar — 1401/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 NI ACT. Status: CROSS OF PW1. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD200019432022
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
Filing Number
1401/2022
Filing Date
16-08-2022
Registration No
1401/2022
Registration Date
16-08-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR
Judge
866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K N Pavan Kumar
Adv. KCS
Respondent(s)
Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR
CROSS OF PW1
CROSS OF PW1
CROSS OF PW1
CROSS OF PW1
CROSS OF PW1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | CROSS OF PW1 |
| 16-02-2026 | CROSS OF PW1 |
| 23-01-2026 | CROSS OF PW1 |
| 31-12-2025 | CROSS OF PW1 |
| 12-12-2025 | CROSS OF PW1 |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. CC 1401-2022 | Witness Examination (PW-1) | Date: 12.12.2025 This is a civil case involving a loan dispute. The witness (PW-1) testified that he lent Rs. 5 lakhs to the accused on September 3, 2020, from agricultural income. The witness stated the loan was given in cash at his home and documented the transaction in his personal diary, though no formal receipt was issued at the time. The accused later provided a check dated July 30, 2021, which the witness alleges bounced. The witness provided three written notices to the accused but received no adequate response, establishing the alleged non-repayment of the loan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. CC 1401-2022 | Witness Examination (PW-1) | Date: 12.12.2025 This is a civil case involving a loan dispute. The witness (PW-1) testified that he lent Rs. 5 lakhs to the accused on September 3, 2020, from agricultural income. The witness stated the loan was given in cash at his home and documented the transaction in his personal diary, though no formal receipt was issued at the time. The accused later provided a check dated July 30, 2021, which the witness alleges bounced. The witness provided three written notices to the accused but received no adequate response, establishing the alleged non-repayment of the loan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts