Smt Devamma vs Shivanna — 1/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 9,R 13 , 151 of CPC. Status: Cross Of Pw1. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Misc. - Miscellaneous Cases.
CNR: KAKD200015522025
Filing Number
1/2025
Filing Date
16-Jul-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
16-Jul-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR
Judge
866-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt Devamma
Adv. S.S Manohar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivanna
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Cross Of Pw1
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
06-Feb-2026
Cross Of Pw1
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
23-Jan-2026
Objection
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
09-Jan-2026
Cross Of Pw1
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
07-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In Misc No. 1/25 dated 07.11.2025, the Civil Judge of Kushalnagar heard the main arguments. The witness oath was administered and certified. Documents from Original Suit No. 43/2022 including the court order, plaint, written statement, and issues were produced and marked as Exhibits 1-4. The case was adjourned for continued main hearing as the petitioner's counsel requested time, which was granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
08-Oct-2025
Calling
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
18-Sep-2025
Calling
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
19-Aug-2025
Calling
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar
-
16-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2025
Summary: In Misc No. 1/25 dated 07.11.2025, the Civil Judge of Kushalnagar heard the main arguments. The witness oath was administered and certified. Documents from Original Suit No. 43/2022 including the court order, plaint, written statement, and issues were produced and marked as Exhibits 1-4. The case was adjourned for continued main hearing as the petitioner's counsel requested time, which was granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts