Jathin Gowda M Rep by Suma M S vs Puttegowda — 25/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7,RULE1,2CPC. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKD200009102022

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

25/2022

Filing Date

08-04-2022

Registration No

25/2022

Registration Date

08-04-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR

Judge

866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7,RULE1,2CPC

Petitioner(s)

Jathin Gowda M Rep by Suma M S

Adv. C P Mahesh

Koushalgowda M

Respondent(s)

Puttegowda

Prema

Manjunath L P

Hemavathi L P

Netharavati L P

Hearing History

Judge: 866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR

06-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

05-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

02-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

21-02-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

11-02-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

13-10-2023
Deposition
13-03-2024
Deposition
30-07-2024
Deposition
07-01-2025
Deposition
28-01-2025
Deposition
12-03-2025
Deposition
11-04-2023
Orders
20-11-2025
Deposition
20-11-2025
Deposition
08-01-2026
Deposition
05-02-2026
Deposition
11-04-2023
Issue
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

Summary: In O.S. No. 25-2022, the civil court recorded the testimony of the 5th defendant on 06.03.2026, who affirmed the truthfulness of their affidavit submitted in the main hearing. The court admitted a digitally signed e-tender purchase document as Evidence 11. The plaintiff's counsel was granted time to file a cross-examination reply, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. No. 25-2022, the civil court recorded the testimony of the 5th defendant on 06.03.2026, who affirmed the truthfulness of their affidavit submitted in the main hearing. The court admitted a digitally signed e-tender purchase document as Evidence 11. The plaintiff's counsel was granted time to file a cross-examination reply, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case