No 19722. Industrialists and Professionals Multi Purpose Cooperative Society Rep by Srijesh B.D. vs Meena — 186/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

Orders Next hearing 17-Mar-2026 this date has passed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAKD200007792025

Filing Number

186/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Registration No

186/2025

Registration Date

22-Apr-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR

Judge

866-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.No 19722. Industrialists and Professionals Multi Purpose Cooperative Society Rep by Srijesh B.D.

    Adv. Nagendra R.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Meena

Case History

  1. 17-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In PCR 186-2025, the court recorded the witness's sworn testimony on 06.03.2026, wherein the witness affirmed that the statement provided is truthful. The opposing party failed to appear, resulting in the case being taken up ex parte (in their absence). The court accepted the testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Calling

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar

  8. 29-Jul-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kushalnagar

  9. 28-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 186/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In PCR 186-2025, the court recorded the witness's sworn testimony on 06.03.2026, wherein the witness affirmed that the statement provided is truthful. The opposing party failed to appear, resulting in the case being taken up ex parte (in their absence). The court accepted the testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case