A C Latha vs Akshatha — 427/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 NI ACT. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD200005732023
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
427/2023
Filing Date
16-03-2023
Registration No
427/2023
Registration Date
16-03-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR
Judge
866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A C Latha
Adv. P.K.Ganapathy
Respondent(s)
Akshatha
Hearing History
Judge: 866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: CC No. 427-2023 (Criminal Case), Witness: PW-1 Date: 21.01.2026 This is a witness examination transcript in a criminal case (likely involving cheque bounce or fraud charges). The witness testified regarding a blank check received from the accused, alleged forgery, and claims about money loaned to the accused. The witness's testimony revealed inconsistencies—he acknowledged having no documents to support various claims about loans, income sources, property ownership, and the circumstances of providing money to the accused. The witness admitted uncertainty about key facts and appeared evasive during cross-examination regarding the accused's alleged debt and the legality of the transactions involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: CC No. 427-2023 (Criminal Case), Witness: PW-1 Date: 21.01.2026 This is a witness examination transcript in a criminal case (likely involving cheque bounce or fraud charges). The witness testified regarding a blank check received from the accused, alleged forgery, and claims about money loaned to the accused. The witness's testimony revealed inconsistencies—he acknowledged having no documents to support various claims about loans, income sources, property ownership, and the circumstances of providing money to the accused. The witness admitted uncertainty about key facts and appeared evasive during cross-examination regarding the accused's alleged debt and the legality of the transactions involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts