A C Latha vs Akshatha — 427/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 NI ACT. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKD200005732023

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

427/2023

Filing Date

16-03-2023

Registration No

427/2023

Registration Date

16-03-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR

Judge

866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 NI ACT

Petitioner(s)

A C Latha

Adv. P.K.Ganapathy

Respondent(s)

Akshatha

Hearing History

Judge: 866-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUSHALNAGAR

12-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

28-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

24-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

19-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

17-06-2025
Deposition
21-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No: CC No. 427-2023 (Criminal Case), Witness: PW-1 Date: 21.01.2026 This is a witness examination transcript in a criminal case (likely involving cheque bounce or fraud charges). The witness testified regarding a blank check received from the accused, alleged forgery, and claims about money loaned to the accused. The witness's testimony revealed inconsistencies—he acknowledged having no documents to support various claims about loans, income sources, property ownership, and the circumstances of providing money to the accused. The witness admitted uncertainty about key facts and appeared evasive during cross-examination regarding the accused's alleged debt and the legality of the transactions involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No: CC No. 427-2023 (Criminal Case), Witness: PW-1 Date: 21.01.2026 This is a witness examination transcript in a criminal case (likely involving cheque bounce or fraud charges). The witness testified regarding a blank check received from the accused, alleged forgery, and claims about money loaned to the accused. The witness's testimony revealed inconsistencies—he acknowledged having no documents to support various claims about loans, income sources, property ownership, and the circumstances of providing money to the accused. The witness admitted uncertainty about key facts and appeared evasive during cross-examination regarding the accused's alleged debt and the legality of the transactions involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUSHALNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case