Nidinji Somaiah Gowda vs N. A. Purushothama — 145/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,Order,VII,rule,1. Status: HEARING Civil. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKD030029482022
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
145/2022
Filing Date
13-12-2022
Registration No
145/2022
Registration Date
14-12-2022
Court
PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MADIKERI
Judge
365-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nidinji Somaiah Gowda
Adv. Sathish Bharadwaj
Sri. Nidinji Belliappa
Sri. Nidinji Kushalappa
Sri. Nidinji Monappa
Sri. Nidinji Chandrashekar
Sri. Nidinji Ganesh
Nidinji S. Damayanthi
Nidinji B. Radhamma
Respondent(s)
N. A. Purushothama
Sri. N. A. Umesh
Sri. N. A. Prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 365-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MADIKERI.
HEARING Civil
HEARING Civil
OBJECTION Civil
OBJECTION Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING Civil |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING Civil |
| 29-01-2026 | OBJECTION Civil |
| 14-01-2026 | OBJECTION Civil |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (O.S. No. 145/22) from the Principal Civil Judge's Court in Madikeri, heard on 02.12.2025. The case concerns disputed ownership of agricultural land parcels in Chemballi village, with competing claims between the plaintiffs and defendants regarding ancestral property rights and right of way. The court heard witness examination and testimony regarding land boundaries, access routes, and a 1987 boundary wall construction, with the case being adjourned to allow the defendant's counsel to continue cross-examination at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil property dispute case (O.S. No. 145/22) from the Principal Civil Judge's Court in Madikeri, heard on 02.12.2025. The case concerns disputed ownership of agricultural land parcels in Chemballi village, with competing claims between the plaintiffs and defendants regarding ancestral property rights and right of way. The court heard witness examination and testimony regarding land boundaries, access routes, and a 1987 boundary wall construction, with the case being adjourned to allow the defendant's counsel to continue cross-examination at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts