The State vs Sirajuddin K.M — 1092/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,414. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKD030023822016

EVIDENCE - Criminal

Next Hearing

25th April 2026

Filing Number

1092/2016

Filing Date

16-12-2016

Registration No

1092/2016

Registration Date

17-12-2016

Court

PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MADIKERI

Judge

365-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MADIKERI.

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,414

Petitioner(s)

The State

Adv. app

Respondent(s)

Sirajuddin K.M

Zakriya B M

Hmeed A A

Ramesha

Hearing History

Judge: 365-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MADIKERI.

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Criminal

29-12-2025

EVIDENCE - Criminal

10-12-2025

EVIDENCE - Criminal

Interim Orders

23-08-2023
Deposition
13-09-2023
Deposition
29-12-2025
Deposition
29-12-2025
Deposition

Summary Civil Case No. 1092/16 before the Principal Civil Judge and J.M. First Class Court, Madikeri (dated 29.12.2025): Witness examination was conducted on a property assessment matter involving Napoklu village. Documentary evidence (NI-12) consisting of a village panchayat certificate was identified by the witness. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding occupancy of a rental property (House No. 75) by Accused-1, and the court noted cross-examination arguments by the accused's counsel challenging the investigation procedures and witness credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Civil Case No. 1092/16 before the Principal Civil Judge and J.M. First Class Court, Madikeri (dated 29.12.2025): Witness examination was conducted on a property assessment matter involving Napoklu village. Documentary evidence (NI-12) consisting of a village panchayat certificate was identified by the witness. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding occupancy of a rental property (House No. 75) by Accused-1, and the court noted cross-examination arguments by the accused's counsel challenging the investigation procedures and witness credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case