Harshith B.P, rep.by natural guardian andmother Smt.Yashoda B.P vs Barike B Aiyanna — 117/2015

Case under - Section U.S26OVIIR1CPC. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY DECREED on 12th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKD020007002015

Case disposed

Filing Number

118/2015

Filing Date

05-11-2015

Registration No

117/2015

Registration Date

05-11-2015

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI

Judge

364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY DECREED

Acts & Sections

- Section U.S26OVIIR1CPC

Petitioner(s)

Harshith B.P, rep.by natural guardian andmother Smt.Yashoda B.P

Adv. Kaveendra C M

Chashmith.B.P,rep.by natural guardian andmother Smt.Yashoda B.P

Respondent(s)

Barike B Aiyanna

Barike A Nanjappa

Barike A Bheemaiah

D- 14 Smt. Ammavva

D- 15 Sri. Hoddetti Raghu,

D- 16 Hoddetti Kushalappa

D-17 Smt. Sarojini

D- 18 Smt. Rathnavathi

D- 19 Smt. Radhaveni,

D- 20 Smt. Premavathi

Hearing History

Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

Interim Orders

17-12-2015
Orders
19-12-2015
Orders
06-01-2020
Deposition
11-02-2020
Deposition
30-08-2021
Deposition
12-01-2022
Deposition
20-07-2022
Deposition
14-09-2022
Deposition
21-10-2022
Deposition
07-01-2023
Deposition
16-01-2023
Deposition
16-01-2023
Deposition
12-10-2018
Issue
02-08-2025
Deposition
01-09-2025
Deposition
27-10-2025
Deposition
04-11-2025
Deposition

The court found that the witness gave false testimony regarding document signatures and the circumstances of their execution. The judge determined that the witness deliberately lied about obtaining signatures from the third defendant's office and falsely testified that the defendant's mother-in-law signed documents in the witness's presence, when evidence showed otherwise. The court rejected the witness's credibility and recorded its conclusion that the testimony was intentionally false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found that the witness gave false testimony regarding document signatures and the circumstances of their execution. The judge determined that the witness deliberately lied about obtaining signatures from the third defendant's office and falsely testified that the defendant's mother-in-law signed documents in the witness's presence, when evidence showed otherwise. The court rejected the witness's credibility and recorded its conclusion that the testimony was intentionally false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case