Pushpavathi vs Mahilan — 137/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166(1). Status: OBJECTION Civil. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKD020006702025

OBJECTION Civil

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

e-Filing Number

04-09-2025

Filing Number

87/2025

Filing Date

04-09-2025

Registration No

137/2025

Registration Date

11-09-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI

Judge

364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

Pushpavathi

Deekshith P

Darshan B D

Respondent(s)

Mahilan

Kumar U

The Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Hearing History

Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

12-03-2026

OBJECTION Civil

06-03-2026

OBJECTION Civil

02-03-2026

OBJECTION Civil

25-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Interim Orders

30-01-2026
Deposition
07-02-2026
Deposition

Summary: In this Motor Vehicle Claim (MVC) case No. 137/2025 dated 07.02.2026, the court heard witness testimony and evidence. The petitioner's counsel presented affidavits, documents, and certified copies of various materials including FIR reports, crime details, seized items, Aadhar cards, vehicle photos, driving licenses, RC certificates, insurance policies, and RTCs. The third respondent failed to appear or submit any counter-statement, and no cross-examination was conducted. The case is now pending the court's final order based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this Motor Vehicle Claim (MVC) case No. 137/2025 dated 07.02.2026, the court heard witness testimony and evidence. The petitioner's counsel presented affidavits, documents, and certified copies of various materials including FIR reports, crime details, seized items, Aadhar cards, vehicle photos, driving licenses, RC certificates, insurance policies, and RTCs. The third respondent failed to appear or submit any counter-statement, and no cross-examination was conducted. The case is now pending the court's final order based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case