Koppada Neelavva vs Koppada C Devaiah — 255/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 403,406,415,420,463,IPc. Status: EVIDENCE - Criminal. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKD020006012023
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
255/2023
Filing Date
05-05-2023
Registration No
255/2023
Registration Date
05-05-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI
Judge
364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Koppada Neelavva
Adv. Pundarika P
Koppada C. Thimmaiah
Respondent(s)
Koppada C Devaiah
Hearing History
Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
EVIDENCE - Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 15-12-2025 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: C.C. 255/2023, Senior Civil Court, Kodagu, Madikeri Outcome: The case was adjourned pending cross-examination of the defendant's counsel. The court heard testimony from witness K.C. Timmayya on 13.01.2026 regarding allegations that the accused (defendant) misappropriated approximately 11 lakhs rupees from his mother's bank account between 2008-2015 without her knowledge or consent, forging her signatures on withdrawal documents. The defendant's lawyer requested adjournment to file a reply, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: C.C. 255/2023, Senior Civil Court, Kodagu, Madikeri Outcome: The case was adjourned pending cross-examination of the defendant's counsel. The court heard testimony from witness K.C. Timmayya on 13.01.2026 regarding allegations that the accused (defendant) misappropriated approximately 11 lakhs rupees from his mother's bank account between 2008-2015 without her knowledge or consent, forging her signatures on withdrawal documents. The defendant's lawyer requested adjournment to file a reply, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts