Nayaz A A vs Ranjan S. P — 117/2025
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE - Civil. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKD020004822025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
e-Filing Number
01-08-2025
Filing Number
82/2025
Filing Date
02-08-2025
Registration No
117/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI
Judge
364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nayaz A A
Respondent(s)
Ranjan S. P
United India Insurance Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In MVC No. 117/2025 before the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Kodagu, the court examined a medical negligence matter involving Dr. Anand Kumar (orthopedic surgeon) who treated a patient for a tibial and fibular bone fracture with surgical implants (rod and screws) in March 2025. The court found that the patient sustained permanent disability with a 6-year bone loss deficit in the affected limb, constituting permanent injury attributable to the defendant-doctor. The matter was adjourned with the defendant's counsel requesting additional time to file a response; the order notes this postponement was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In MVC No. 117/2025 before the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Kodagu, the court examined a medical negligence matter involving Dr. Anand Kumar (orthopedic surgeon) who treated a patient for a tibial and fibular bone fracture with surgical implants (rod and screws) in March 2025. The court found that the patient sustained permanent disability with a 6-year bone loss deficit in the affected limb, constituting permanent injury attributable to the defendant-doctor. The matter was adjourned with the defendant's counsel requesting additional time to file a response; the order notes this postponement was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts