Nayaz A A vs Ranjan S. P — 117/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE - Civil. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKD020004822025

EVIDENCE - Civil

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

01-08-2025

Filing Number

82/2025

Filing Date

02-08-2025

Registration No

117/2025

Registration Date

07-08-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI

Judge

364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Nayaz A A

Respondent(s)

Ranjan S. P

United India Insurance Co Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 364-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI.

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

Interim Orders

30-01-2026
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary In MVC No. 117/2025 before the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Kodagu, the court examined a medical negligence matter involving Dr. Anand Kumar (orthopedic surgeon) who treated a patient for a tibial and fibular bone fracture with surgical implants (rod and screws) in March 2025. The court found that the patient sustained permanent disability with a 6-year bone loss deficit in the affected limb, constituting permanent injury attributable to the defendant-doctor. The matter was adjourned with the defendant's counsel requesting additional time to file a response; the order notes this postponement was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In MVC No. 117/2025 before the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Kodagu, the court examined a medical negligence matter involving Dr. Anand Kumar (orthopedic surgeon) who treated a patient for a tibial and fibular bone fracture with surgical implants (rod and screws) in March 2025. The court found that the patient sustained permanent disability with a 6-year bone loss deficit in the affected limb, constituting permanent injury attributable to the defendant-doctor. The matter was adjourned with the defendant's counsel requesting additional time to file a response; the order notes this postponement was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case