Babitha vs Nithin Devaiah M T Advocate - Kavan. K. S. — 67/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/Sec.166. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 17-Mar-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKD020002772025

e-Filing Number

02-05-2025

Filing Number

60/2025

Filing Date

09-May-2025

Registration No

67/2025

Registration Date

09-May-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM MADIKERI

Judge

364-Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/Sec.166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Babitha

    Adv. Shridhar B K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nithin Devaiah M T Advocate - Kavan. K. S.

  2. 2.M M Thammaiah

  3. 3.The New India Assurance Company Ltd

Case History

  1. 17-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The witness testimony in this motor vehicle accident case (MVC No. 67/2025) was recorded on 06.02.2026. The witness testified about injuries sustained in a hit-and-run accident, claiming the responsible vehicle could not be identified and later falsely reporting vehicle number MEQ9573, while also admitting to fabricating medical bills and providing false evidence to obtain compensation. The court found the witness's testimony to be dishonest and unreliable, noting contradictions in the account and fraudulent documentation presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Deposition

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  13. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  14. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  17. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  18. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  19. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  20. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  21. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  22. 01-Aug-2025

    IssueView PDF

  23. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence - Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  24. 25-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  25. 04-Jul-2025

    Objection Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  26. 20-Jun-2025

    Objection Civil

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  27. 06-Jun-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Madikeri.

  28. 09-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 09-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The witness testimony in this motor vehicle accident case (MVC No. 67/2025) was recorded on 06.02.2026. The witness testified about injuries sustained in a hit-and-run accident, claiming the responsible vehicle could not be identified and later falsely reporting vehicle number MEQ9573, while also admitting to fabricating medical bills and providing false evidence to obtain compensation. The court found the witness's testimony to be dishonest and unreliable, noting contradictions in the account and fraudulent documentation presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case